Discuss the legal principles that forced the shift in advocacy to an adversarial system.
The original juvenile justice system (JJS) positioned the judge as the primary advocate for the juvenile, but things have evolved over time to replace the parens patriae doctrine with due process, which makes the defense attorney the primary advocate in an adversarial system.
Further, describe the legal principles that forced the shift in advocacy to an adversarial system. Finally, determine if the concept of advocacy should provide extended protection to juveniles from lower economic statuses.
In your explanation, make sure that you include any case law that catalyzes these changes and the logic of the ruling in those cases.
Your essay should contain some details about the nature of the reform and what aspect of advocacy has been strengthened over time in the opinion of the authors.
Your essay should comply with APA format for written academic work and be three pages in length—excluding title and reference pages. All ideas and information borrowed from other sources should be properly cited and included in a reference section. Any external sources used should be scholarly in nature and no older than seven years from the publication date.
Hint: Give some consideration to the relative weight or balance between the philosophies of treatment, rehabilitation, deterrence, and punishment for the juvenile.
The post Discuss the legal principles that forced the shift in advocacy to an adversarial system. appeared first on Lion Essays.
“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”
Discuss the legal principles that forced the shift in advocacy to an adversarial system. was first posted on April 1, 2019 at 9:26 pm.©2019 “Lion Essays”. Use of this feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this article in your feed reader, then the site is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact me at support@Lion Essays.com